Buy diazepam cod, Director-General, Mark Thompson, recently unveiled the BBC's Creative Future, a plan to radically restructure the British Broadcasting Corporation. Buy diazepam pills, Thompson spoke not of a superficial makeover, but a complete transformation and regrouping of all the BBC's resources, cheap diazepam online legally, Cheapest diazepam prices, centering around a web 2.0 blueprint. He talked of radical change, buy generic diazepam, Diazepam over the counter, “All media – sound, picture, West Virginia WV W.Va. , For diazepam online, text – available on all devices, all the time, cheap diazepam online cheap. Ordering diazepam online cheap, Searchable, movable, generic diazepam, Maryland MD Md. , share-able.” Many journalists draw comparisons between the BBC's Creative Future and popular commercial services such as Flickr, YouTube and MySpace, αγοράσετε diazepam έκπτωση. South Carolina SC S.C. , In fact, Rupert Murdoch's News Corp, buy diazepam c.o.d., Indiana IN Ind. , the owner of MySpace, protests the BBC's plan, Oregon OR Ore. , Acheter diazepam discount, saying that use of levied money to create a so-called “digital empire”, is an unfair advantage the BBC has over commercial competitors, Vermont VT Vt. .
That begs the question: who should be leading the Creative Future of the US, buy diazepam cod. Cheap diazepam, The social media field is dominated by commercial players such as News Corp, Yahoo and Google - who offer compelling web applications and services, Minnesota MN Minn. . Online diazepam, In many cases, comparable non-commercial alternatives cannot directly compete with mainstream solutions; they struggle for funding, New Jersey NJ N.J. , Comprar diazepam baratos, lack features, or do not have a salient user-base, cheap diazepam overnight delivery. Cheapest diazepam online, While in other cases, there are literally no non-commercial alternatives (Flickr, MySpace, Digg). Are commercial participatory media services public media. Is it in our best interest to furnish publicly funded alternatives which compete directly with these popular commercial services and web applications. Who is best suited to provide these solutions.
Full Transcript of Mark Thompson's 2006 Fleming Memorial Lecture.
Similar posts: Buy viagra no prescription. Buy sildenafil citrate no rx. Buy propecia without prescription. Order diazepam online cheap. Propecia over the counter. Sildenafil citrate from mexico.
Trackbacks from: Buy diazepam cod. Buy diazepam cod. Buy diazepam cod. Buy diazepam cod. Buy diazepam cod. Buy diazepam cod.
[…] Who is in Charge of the US’s Creative Future? (Beyond Broadcast Web log). […]
A very interesting and prescient post extrapolated from a truly significant event. Here’s a rambling reaction:
To me, the British announcement that they are being technologically proactive with the BBC comes as a breath of fresh air. Being a citizen of both little Latvia and the world superpower U.S., I have long mused about how governments can better maximize human resources. I see advantages and disadvantages as far as size of population and size of warchest, but in all circumstances believe that it hinges on better communication, specifically Web 2.0 and the Metaverse.
There is an ASTOUNDING amount of efficiency that can be generated by integrating using bottom-up social and information structures. Societies that better network their people and their information will outperform societies that do not. (I won’t bore you with examples, but can give hundreds.) The bottom line: as Web 2.0 and the Metaverse evolve, the race is on to quickly integrate these new tools in order to make our systems more efficient, smarter, faster. Countries must embrace this or suffer the economic consequences.
Therefore, when Rupert Murdoch’s News Corp, the owner of MySpace, protests the BBC’s plan, saying that use of levied money to create a so-called “digital empire”, is an unfair advantage the BBC has over commercial competitors. I think, “F*ck that!” That man is asking his govenment to hold back development of a communication network so that his company can gain Web 2.0 marketshare (aka human brains) at the expense of that nation. Not only that, but his request to halt this British communication experiment then slows down the process of intergrating Web 2.0 throughout the British governing system. Britain cannot appease Murdoch and should actually censure this progress-retarding request.
The question Are commercial participatory media services public media? is fascinating. Regardless of what we think the answer should be, events will conspire to force a blurring of the lines. First off, I think people will only join the media networks that most benefit them, and that this will force a change in what commercial participatory media services will look like. The Web 2.0 networks that best reimburse folks for their time and information via pay, access to software, exclusive access to a certain network, etc. will survive and thrive. It is a mistake to believe that the ones that currently exist will continue to dominate the marketplace unless they continue to change form and give their users a bigger chunk of the pie. — The Mandate of Kevin — Second, the government has already been requesting access to information networks for security purposes and that this appetitie will only grow larger (probably for the benefit of most). I can imagine several near-future scenarios in which the goverment might request exisiting information it needs to do a huge public good, thereby exerting popular pressure to open up a previously private enterprise. The tendency for this wioll grow as people begin to realize better the true value of their information. — Anyway, that’s a fun one to think about.
I love this one too. Is it in our best interest to furnish publicly funded alternatives which compete directly with these popular commercial services and web applications? I think it is in our best interest to publicly fund alternatives, but that public bottom-up structures will pop-up all over the place and largely evolve on their own. Now is the time to help these little tomato plants up to the sun.
Who is best suited to provide these solutions? I think that groups of people are. By harnesing idea markets and Web 2.0 to better hone in on the system efficiences we will create the dynamic new solutions required.
Just like Return of the Living Dead part II, it’s all about the brains. And how they’re networked.
I thoroughly agree with Alvis. Murdock obviously has blurry vision. The development of what the BBC has in mind would further establish Myspace as an allstar info/media/technology exchange center. He is an old brain and probably does not fully understand the full potential of his newly purchased device.
The title of this blog brings up an interesting issue..Who is in charge of the US’ creative future?
The issue lies in the future if technology and software that either enables full communication with a result of resource/money exchange or limits both. Whoever writes the software, whether it be a goth computer geek or a large firm in the Valley, this is where the control begins. Our creative future depends on the tools we are given, and the success of those tools rely on three layers that can be either free or controlled in any combination. The Physical, code and content layers are the ingredients to unhealthy and/or healthy economics. If the future of creativity in America is exclusive with a monopoly system that runs strictly on controlled software then we are doomed.
Myspace uses these layers beautifully. The physical layer is completely free, it doesn’t matter where you are, you can be on myspace and for free, as long as you have access to a computer. The content layer is alos free with very slight limitations on crude and offensive material, other than that, it’s free. The code is controlled, but it is for the sake of the system’s functionality. And with sites like photobucket, youtube etc, the code layer on myspace is at least understood by a large population of members. So being that most of history’s innovation was based on these layers, the future of our creativity is completely dependent on them as well. I actually think we will need to start a very beautfil relationship with India in the next five years in order to maintain our creative rights, unless we start teaching code and foreign language sometime before 2nd grade, which is another issue the government should be thinking about.
Huh?